Which method compares each employee's performance to a predetermined standard or expected level of output?

Which method compares each employee's performance to a predetermined standard or expected level of output?

• A. Work Standards Method
• B. Ranking Method
• C. Forced Distribution Method
• D. 360-Degree Feedback Evaluation Method

Answer: (A)

Evaluating performance against a predefined standard means setting clear, objective output targets for each job and judging what an employee actually produced against those targets. In the Work Standards Method, standards specify the expected quantity, quality, and time for tasks, and performance is measured by how closely an employee’s output meets or exceeds those benchmarks. This creates a consistent, objective yardstick and helps pinpoint exact gaps and development needs tied to specific results. This approach is especially effective for jobs with measurable, repetitive tasks where you can quantify output. It’s different from methods that rely on comparing employees to one another, use forced rating distributions, or gather feedback on behaviors from many sources rather than on meeting fixed standards.

Evaluating performance against a predefined standard means setting clear, objective output targets for each job and judging what an employee actually produced against those targets. In the Work Standards Method, standards specify the expected quantity, quality, and time for tasks, and performance is measured by how closely an employee’s output meets or exceeds those benchmarks. This creates a consistent, objective yardstick and helps pinpoint exact gaps and development needs tied to specific results.

This approach is especially effective for jobs with measurable, repetitive tasks where you can quantify output. It’s different from methods that rely on comparing employees to one another, use forced rating distributions, or gather feedback on behaviors from many sources rather than on meeting fixed standards.